The way that citations read for focus group interviews is confusing and I find that the fields included for the “interview” citation type are a bit off. For example, there is a field for “type” but that does not appear anywhere in the citation. It would be helpful to have sub-types for interviews, including unstructured, semi-structured, structured, focus group, on-camera, etc
Thanks for the feedback. The information included in citations varies between styles, which map metadata fields in a pre-configured/standardized way. If you find bits of information (like the type) are not being included but should be as per style guidelines, please let us know the style so we can try reproducing and maybe find a workaround on our end. Otherwise, I can add the request for more interview sub-types to our tracker. Let me know either way.